www.uhasselt.be
DSpace

Document Server@UHasselt >
Research >
Research publications >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/9648

Title: A comparative evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Multi-Slice CT (MSCT) Part I. On subjective image quality.
Authors: Liang, X
Jacobs, R.
Hassan, B.
Li, L.
Pauwels, R.
Corpas, L.
Souza, P.C.
MARTENS, Wendy
Shahbazian, M.
ALONSO ABAD, Ariel
LAMBRICHTS, Ivo
Issue Date: 2009
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 75(2). p. 265-269
Abstract: Aims: To compare image quality and visibility of anatomical structures in the mandible between five Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scanners and one Multi-Slice CT (MSCT) system. - Materials and methods: One dry mandible was scanned with five CBCT scanners (Accuitomo 3D, i-CAT, NewTom 3G, Galileos, Scanora 3D) and one MSCT system (Somatom Sensation 16) using 13 different scan protocols. Visibility of 11 anatomical structures and overall image noise were compared between CBCT and MSCT. Five independent observers reviewed the CBCT and the MSCT images in the three orthographic planes (axial, sagittal and coronal) and assessed image quality on a five-point scale. - Results: Significant differences were found in the visibility of the different anatomical structures and image noise level between MSCT and CBCT and among the five CBCT systems (p = 0.0001). Delicate structures such as trabecular bone and periodontal ligament were significantly less visible and more variable among the systems in comparison with other anatomical structures (p = 0.0001). Visibility of relatively large structures such as mandibular canal and mental foramen was satisfactory for all devices. The Accuitomo system was superior to MSCT and all other CBCT systems in depicting anatomical structures while MSCT was superior to all other CBCT systems in terms of reduced image noise. - Conclusions: CBCT image quality is comparable or even superior to MSCT even though some variability exists among the different CBCT systems in depicting delicate structures. Considering the low radiation dose and high-resolution imaging, CBCT could be beneficial for dentomaxillofacial radiology.
Notes: Available online - Xin Liang (a,b), Reinhilde Jacobs (a), Bassam Hassan (c), Limin Li (d), Ruben Pauwels (a), Livia Corpas (a), Paulo Couto Souza (a), Wendy Martens (e), Maryam Shahbazian (a), Arie Alonso (f) and Ivo Lambrichts (e): (a) Oral Imaging Centre, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium - (b) College of Stomatology, Dalian Medical University, China - (c) Department of Oral Radiology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands - (d) Department of Paediatric Dentistry and Special Dental Care, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium - (e) Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Hasselt, Diepenbeek, Belgium - (f)Department of Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics, Universiteit Hasselt, Belgium
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/9648
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.03.042
ISI #: 000281484400027
ISSN: 0720-048X
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validation: ecoom, 2011
Appears in Collections: Research publications

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.