Document Server@UHasselt >
Research publications >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||A critical view on social performance assessment at company level: Social life cycle analysis of an algae case|
|Authors: ||Rafiaani, Parisa|
Van Dael, Miet
Van Passel, Steven
|Issue Date: ||2019|
|Citation: ||The international journal of life cycle assessment,|
|Status: ||In Press|
|Abstract: ||Purpose Social indicators are not easy to be quantitatively analysed, although at the local scale, the social impacts might be relevant and important. Using the existing approaches for both quantitative and semi-qualitative measurements, this study aims to assess the social impacts of a company working on algae production systems in Belgium through social life cycle analysis (SLCA). By highlighting the opportunities and challenges on the way of applying the existing SLCA approaches at company level, the objective of this study is to contribute to the development of a suitable and clear SLCA approach when a company is considered as the unit of analysis.
Methods Based on the list of potential social impact categories suggested by UNEP/SETAC guidelines (2009) for SLCA, three stakeholder groups (workers, consumers and local community) and three subcategories associated to each stakeholder group were identified as the most relevant for CCU technologies. Company and sector level data were collected using existing documents and reports and the data were analysed and scored using a combined quantitative and semi-quantitative approach to develop a social assessment model for the case study.
Results and discussion The company appears to perform well for all the evaluated social indicators except the one related to the subcategory ‘Equal opportunity/Discrimination for workers’ for which the share of women employed is lower compared to the sector level data. The results of our assessment were further discussed regarding the challenges and limitations of performing SLCA at the company level. Based on our experience, the validity of the outcomes is significantly influenced by the data availability, the generality of the indicators introduced within the UNEP/SETAC guidelines and the subjectivity in data collection for the semi-quantitative assessment among others.
Conclusions By highlighting the difficulties and challenges of applying the SLCA at the company level, our study provides a starting point for improving the quantitative assessment and monitoring social implications at the company level within a regional foreground in Europe.|
|Type: ||Journal Contribution|
|Appears in Collections: ||Research publications|
Files in This Item:
|Peer-reviewed author version - Main article||746.18 kB||Adobe PDF|
|published version||593.61 kB||Adobe PDF|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.