Document Server@UHasselt >
Research >
Research publications >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/28785

Title: Perspective: Consideration of Values When Setting Priorities in Nutrition Research: Guidance for Transparency
Authors: Hawwash, Dana
Pinxten, Wim
Aubert Bonn, Noemie
Verstraeten, Roosmarijn
Kolsteren, Patrick
Lachat, Carl
Issue Date: 2018
Citation: ADVANCES IN NUTRITION, 9(6), p. 671-687
Abstract: Nutrition research can guide interventions to tackle the burden of diet-related diseases. Setting priorities in nutrition research, however, requires the engagement of various stakeholders with diverse insights. Consideration of what matters most in research from a scientific, social, and ethical perspective is therefore not an automatic process. Systematic ways to explicitly define and consider relevant values are largely lacking. Here, we review existing nutrition research priority-setting exercises, analyze how values are reported, and provide guidance for transparent consideration of values while setting priorities in nutrition research. Of the 27 (n=22 peer-reviewed manuscripts and 5 grey literature documents) studies reviewed, 40.7% used a combination of different methods, 59.3% described the represented stakeholders, and 49.1% reported on follow-up activities. All priority-setting exercises were led by research groups based in high-income countries. Via an iterative qualitative content analysis, reported values were identified (n = 22 manuscripts). Three clusters of values (i.e., those related to impact, feasibility, and accountability) were identified. These values were organized in a tool to help those involved in setting research priorities systematically consider and report values. The tool was finalized through an online consultation with 7 international stakeholders. The value-oriented tool for priority setting in nutrition research identifies and presents values that are already implicitly and explicitly represented in priority-setting exercises. It provides guidance to enable explicit deliberation on research priorities from an ethical perspective. In addition, it can serve as a reporting tool to document how value-laden choices are made during priority setting and help foster the accountability of stakeholders involved.
Notes: [Hawwash, Dana; Kolsteren, Patrick; Lachat, Carl] Univ Ghent, Dept Food Technol Safety & Hlth, Ghent, Belgium. [Pinxten, Wim; Bonn, Noemie Aubert] Hasselt Univ, Fac Med & Life Sci, Hasselt, Belgium.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/28785
DOI: 10.1093/advances/nmy039
ISI #: 000450794300002
ISSN: 2161-8313
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Appears in Collections: Research publications

Files in This Item:

Description SizeFormat
Published version478.49 kBAdobe PDF
published version481.29 kBAdobe PDF
Peer reviewed author version 926.57 kBAdobe PDF

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.