Document Server@UHasselt >
Research >
Research publications >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/25298

Title: The Frontier Fields lens modelling comparison project
Authors: Meneghetti M.
Natarajan P.
Coe D.
Contini E.
De Lucia G.
Giocoli C.
Acebron A.
Borgani S.
Bradac M.
Diego J.M.
Hoag A.
Ishigaki M.
Johnson T.L.
Jullo E.
Kawamata R.
Lam D.
Limousin M.
Liesenborgs, Jori
Oguri M.
Sebesta K.
Sharon K.
Williams L.L.R.
Zitrin A.
Issue Date: 2017
Citation: Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (Print), 472(3), p. 3177-3216
Abstract: Gravitational lensing by clusters of galaxies offers a powerful probe of their structure and mass distribution. Several research groups have developed techniques independently to achieve this goal. While these methods have all provided remarkably high-precision mass maps, particularly with exquisite imaging data from the Hubble Space Telescope (HST), the reconstructions themselves have never been directly compared. In this paper, we present for the first time a detailed comparison of methodologies for fidelity, accuracy and precision. For this collaborative exercise, the lens modelling community was provided simulated cluster images that mimic the depth and resolution of the ongoing HST Frontier Fields. The results of the submitted reconstructions with the un-blinded true mass profile of these two clusters are presented here. Parametric, free-form and hybrid techniques have been deployed by the participating groups and we detail the strengths and trade-offs in accuracy and systematics that arise for each methodology. We note in conclusion that several properties of the lensing clusters are recovered equally well by most of the lensing techniques compared in this study. For example, the reconstruction of azimuthally averaged density and mass profiles by both parametric and free-form methods matches the input models at the level of ∼10 per cent. Parametric techniques are generally better at recovering the 2D maps of the convergence and of the magnification. For the best-performing algorithms, the accuracy in the magnification estimate is ∼10 per cent at μ_true = 3 and it degrades to ∼30 per cent at μ_true ∼ 10
Notes: Meneghetti, M (reprint author), Osservatorio Astron Bologna, Via Gobetti 93-3, I-40129 Bologna, Italy. massimo.meneghetti@oabo.inaf.it
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/25298
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx2064
ISI #: 000413088400057
ISSN: 0035-8711
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Appears in Collections: Research publications

Files in This Item:

Description SizeFormat
Published version11.43 MBAdobe PDF
Peer-reviewed author version25.51 MBAdobe PDF

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.