Document Server@UHasselt >
Research >
Research publications >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/23865

Title: Utilitarian framings of biodiversity shape environmental impact assessment in development cooperation
Authors: Hugé, Jean
Rochette, Anne-Julie
Janssens de Bisthoven, Luc
Dahdouh-Guebasa, Farid
Koedam, Nico
Vanhove, Maarten P.M.
Issue Date: 2017
Citation: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 75, p. 91-102
Abstract: Biodiversity is under threat from anthropogenic pressures, in particular in biodiversity-rich developing countries. Development cooperation actors, who traditionally focus on the improvement of socio-economic conditions in the South, are increasingly acknowledging the linkages between poverty and biodiversity, e.g. by referring to the ecosystem services framework. However, there are many different framings which stress the need for biodiversity integration and which influence how biodiversity and development are and/or should be linked. Moreover, there is a gap between the lip service paid to biodiversity integration and the reality of development cooperation interventions. This study analyses how biodiversity framings are reflected in environmental impact assessment (EIA) practice, and how these framings influence EIA and decision-making. The findings, based on an in-depth qualitative analysis of World Bank EIAs undertaken in West Africa, indicate the incoherent quality but also the dominance of the ‘utilitarian’ and ‘corrective’ framings, which respectively stress human use of nature and mitigation of negative unintended development impacts. Identifying and highlighting these discursive trends leads to increased awareness of the importance of biodiversity among all development actors in North and South. However, some framings may lead to an overly narrow human-centred approach which downplays the intrinsic value of biodiversity. This study proposes recommendations for an improved integration of biodiversity in development cooperation, including the need for more systematic baseline studies in EIAs.
Notes: Huge, J (reprint author), Vrije Univ Brussel, Plant Biol & Nat Management APNA, Pl Laan 2, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium jean.huge@ulb.ac.be
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/23865
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.06.003
ISI #: 000407869500011
ISSN: 1462-9011
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Appears in Collections: Research publications

Files in This Item:

Description SizeFormat
Published version298.71 kBAdobe PDF
Supplementary Material: Tables741.84 kBAdobe PDF
Peer-reviewed author version671.29 kBAdobe PDF

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.