www.uhasselt.be
DSpace

Document Server@UHasselt >
Research >
Research publications >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/22007

Title: Where Do Female Sex Workers Seek HIV and Reproductive Health Care and What Motivates These Choices? A Survey in 4 Cities in India, Kenya, Mozambique and South Africa
Authors: Lafort, Yves
Greener, Ross
Roy, Anuradha
Greener, Letitia
Ombidi, Wilkister
Lessitala, Faustino
Haghparast-Bidgoli, Hassan
Beksinska, Mags
Gichangi, Peter
Reza-Paul, Sushena
Smit, Jenni A.
Chersich, Matthew
Delva, Wim
Issue Date: 2016
Citation: PloS one, 11(8) (Art N° e0160730)
Abstract: Background A baseline cross-sectional survey among female sex workers (FSWs) was conducted in four cities within the context of an implementation research project aiming to improve FSWs’ access to HIV, and sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services. The survey measured where FSWs seek HIV/SRH care and what motivates their choice. Methods Using respondent-driven sampling (RDS), FWSs were recruited in Durban, South Africa (n = 400), Tete, Mozambique (n = 308), Mombasa, Kenya (n = 400) and Mysore, India (n = 458) and interviewed. RDS-adjusted proportions were estimated by non-parametric bootstrapping, and compared across cities using post-hoc pairwise comparison tests. Results Across cities, FSWs most commonly sought care for the majority of HIV/SRH services at public health facilities, most especially in Durban (ranging from 65% for condoms to 97% for HIV care). Services specifically targeting FSWs only had a high coverage in Mysore for STI care (89%) and HIV testing (79%). Private-for-profit clinics were important providers in Mombasa (ranging from 17% for STI care and HIV testing to 43% for HIV care), but not in the other cities. The most important reason for the choice of care provider in Durban and Mombasa was proximity, in Tete ‘where they always go’, and in Mysore cost of care. Where available, clinics specifically targeting FSWs were more often chosen because of shorter waiting times, perceived higher quality of care, more privacy and friendlier personnel. Conclusion The place where care is sought for HIV/SRH services differs substantially between cities. Targeted services have limited coverage in the African cities compared to Mysore. Convenience appears more important for choosing the place of care than aspects of quality of care. The best model to improve access, linking targeted interventions with general health services, will need to be tailored to the specific context of each city.
Notes: Lafort, Y (reprint author), Univ Ghent, Int Ctr Reprod Hlth, Ghent, Belgium. yves.lafort@ugent.be
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/22007
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160730
ISI #: 000381369500081
ISSN: 1932-6203
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validation: ecoom, 2017
Appears in Collections: Research publications

Files in This Item:

Description SizeFormat
Published version198.83 kBAdobe PDF

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.