Document Server@UHasselt >
Research publications >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||How do cumulative live birth rates and cumulative multiple live birth rates over complete courses of assisted reproductive technology treatment per woman compare among registries?|
|Authors: ||De Neubourg, D.|
|Issue Date: ||2016|
|Citation: ||HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 31(1), p. 93-99.|
|Abstract: ||STUDY QUESTION How do the national cumulative (multiple) live birth rates over complete assisted reproduction technology (ART) courses of treatment per woman in Belgium compare to those in other registries?
SUMMARY ANSWER Cumulative live birth rates (CLBRs) remain high with a low cumulative multiple live birth rate when compared with other registries and publications.
WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY In ART, a reduction in the multiple live birth rate could be achieved by reducing the number of embryos transferred. It has been shown that by doing so, live birth rates per cycle were maintained, particularly when the augmentation effect of attached frozen-thawed cycles was considered.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A retrospective cohort study included all patients with a Belgian national insurance number who were registered in the national ART registry (Belrap) and who started a first fresh ART cycle between 1 July 2009 until 31 December 2011 with follow up until 31 December 2012. We analysed 12 869 patients and 38 008 cycles (both fresh and attached frozen cycles).
PARTICIPANTS, MATERIALS, SETTINGS, METHODS CLBRs per patient who started a first ART cycle including fresh and consecutive frozen cycles leading to a live birth. Conservative estimates of cumulative live birth assumed that patients who did not return for treatment had no chance of achieving an ART-related live birth, whereas optimal estimates assumed that women discontinuing treatment would have the same chance of achieving a live birth as those continuing treatment. A maximum of six fresh ART cycles with corresponding frozen cycles was investigated and compared with other registries and publications.
MAIN RESULTS AND ROLE OF CHANCE The CLBR was age dependent and declined from 62.9% for women <35 years, to 51.4% for women 35–37 years, to 34.1% for women 38–40 years and 17.7% for women 41–42 years in the conservative analysis after six cycles. In the optimal estimate, the CLBR declined from 85.9% for women <35 years, to 72.0% for women 35–37 years, to 50.4% for women 38–40 years and 36.4% for women 41–42 years. The cumulative multiple live birth rates for the whole population were 5.1 and 8.6% for the conservative and optimal estimate, respectively.
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Conservative and optimal estimates use assumptions for the whole ART population and do not take the individual patient into account.
WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS These data reinforce the validity of the Belgian model of coupling reimbursement of ART costs to a restriction in the number of embryos transferred. Our data can improve decision-making in medical ART practice both on the patient level and for society at large and could provide health care takers and insurance companies with a valid model.|
|ISI #: ||000371148900013|
|Type: ||Journal Contribution|
|Validation: ||ecoom, 2017|
|Appears in Collections: ||Research publications|
Files in This Item:
|published version||241 kB||Adobe PDF|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.