Document Server@UHasselt >
Research >
Research publications >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/16983

Title: The Care Process Self-Evaluation Tool: a valid and reliable instrument for measuring care process organization of health care teams
Authors: Seys, Deborah
Deneckere, Svin
Sermeus, Walter
Van Gerven, Eva
Panella, Massimiliano
Bruyneel, Luk
Mutsvari, Timothy
Camacho Bejarano, Rafaela
Kul, Seval
Vanhaecht, Kris
Issue Date: 2013
Citation: BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 13, p. Art. N° 325
Abstract: Background: Patient safety can be increased by improving the organization of care. A tool that evaluates the actual organization of care, as perceived by multidisciplinary teams, is the Care Process Self-Evaluation Tool (CPSET). CPSET was developed in 2007 and includes 29 items in five subscales: (a) patient-focused organization, (b) coordination of the care process, (c) collaboration with primary care, (d) communication with patients and family, and (e) follow-up of the care process. The goal of the present study was to further evaluate the psychometric properties of the CPSET at the team and hospital levels and to compile a cutoff score table. Methods: The psychometric properties of the CPSET were assessed in a multicenter study in Belgium and the Netherlands. In total, 3139 team members from 114 hospitals participated. Psychometric properties were evaluated by using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Cronbach's alpha, interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), Kruskall-Wallis test, and Mann-Whitney test. For the cutoff score table, percentiles were used. Demographic variables were also evaluated. Results: CFA showed a good model fit: a normed fit index of 0.93, a comparative fit index of 0.94, an adjusted goodness-of-fit index of 0.87, and a root mean square error of approximation of 0.06. Cronbach's alpha values were between 0.869 and 0.950. The team-level ICCs varied between 0.127 and 0.232 and were higher than those at the hospital level (0.071-0.151). Male team members scored significantly higher than females on 2 of the 5 subscales and on the overall CPSET. There were also significant differences among age groups. Medical doctors scored significantly higher on 4 of the 5 subscales and on the overall CPSET. Coordinators of care processes scored significantly lower on 2 of the 5 subscales and on the overall CPSET. Cutoff scores for all subscales and the overall CPSET were calculated. Conclusions: The CPSET is a valid and reliable instrument for health care teams to measure the extent care processes are organized. The cutoff table permits teams to compare how they perceive the organization of their care process relative to other teams.
Notes: [Seys, Deborah; Deneckere, Svin; Sermeus, Walter; Van Gerven, Eva; Bruyneel, Luk; Vanhaecht, Kris] Univ Louvain, Ctr Hlth Serv & Nursing Res, Dept Publ Hlth, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium. [Panella, Massimiliano] Amedeo Avogadro Univ Eastern Piedmont, Fac Med, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Dept Publ Hlth, Novara, Italy. [Mutsvari, Timothy] Katholieke Univ Leuven, L Biostat, Louvain, Belgium. [Mutsvari, Timothy] Hasselt Univ, Hasselt, Belgium. [Camacho Bejarano, Rafaela] Univ Huelva, Dept Nursing, Huelva, Spain. [Kul, Seval] Gaziantep Univ, Fac Med, Dept Biostat, Sahinbey, Gaziantep, Turkey. [Vanhaecht, Kris] Western Norway Res Network Integrated Care, Helse Fonna, Haugesund, Norway.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/16983
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-325
ISI #: 000323384400001
ISSN: 1472-6963
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validation: ecoom, 2014
Appears in Collections: Research publications

Files in This Item:

Description SizeFormat
N/A182.78 kBAdobe PDF

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.