Document Server@UHasselt >
Research publications >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||Nifedipine versus atosiban in the treatment of threatened preterm labour (Assessment of Perinatal Outcome after Specific Tocolysis in Early Labour: APOSTEL III-Trial)|
|Authors: ||van Vliet, Elvira O. G.|
Heida, Karst Y.
Opmeer, Brent C.
Porath, Martina M.
Bax, Caroline J.
Bloemenkamp, Kitty W. M.
Scheepers, Hubertina C. J.
van Beek, Erik
Duvekot, Hans J. J.
Franssen, Maureen T. M.
Bijvank, Bas N.
Kok, Joke H.
Mol, Ben Willem J.
Oudijk, Martijn A.
|Issue Date: ||2014|
|Citation: ||BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 14, (ART N° 93)|
|Abstract: ||Background: Preterm birth is the most common cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Postponing delivery for 48 hours with tocolytics to allow for maternal steroid administration and antenatal transportation to a centre with neonatal intensive care unit facilities is the standard treatment for women with threatening preterm delivery in most centres. However, there is controversy as to which tocolytic agent is the drug of first choice. Previous trials
have focused on tocolytic efficacy and side effects, and are probably underpowered to detect clinically meaningfull differences in neonatal outcome. Thus, the current evidence is inconclusive to support a balanced recommendation for clinical practice. This multicenter randomised clinical trial aims to compare nifedipine and atosiban in terms of neonatal outcome, duration of pregnancy and maternal side effects.
Methods/Design: The Apostel III trial is a nationwide multicenter randomised controlled study. Women with threatened preterm labour (gestational age 25 – 34 weeks) defined as at least 3 contractions per 30 minutes, and 1) a cervical length of ≤ 10 mm or 2) a cervical length of 11-30 mm and a positive Fibronectin test or 3) ruptured
membranes will be randomly allocated to treatment with nifedipine or atosiban. Primary outcome is a composite measure of severe neonatal morbidity and mortality. Secondary outcomes will be time to delivery, gestational age at delivery, days on ventilation support, neonatal intensive care (NICU) admittance, length admission in neonatal intensive care, total days in hospital until 3 months corrected age, convulsions, apnoea, asphyxia, proven meningitis,
pneumothorax, maternal side effects and costs. Furthermore, an economic evaluation of the treatment will be performed. Analysis will be by intention to treat principle. The power calculation is based on an expected 10% difference in the prevalence of adverse neonatal outcome. This implies that 500 women have to be randomised
(two sided test, β 0.2 at alpha 0.05).|
|Notes: ||van Vliet, EOG (reprint author), Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Utrecht, Netherlands.
|ISI #: ||000332668500001|
|Type: ||Journal Contribution|
|Validation: ||ecoom, 2015|
|Appears in Collections: ||Research publications|
Files in This Item:
|artikel||149.8 kB||Adobe PDF|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.