Document Server@UHasselt >
Research >
Research publications >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/15827

Title: Developing principles of sustainability and stakeholder engagement for gentle remediation approaches: the European context
Authors: Cundy, Andrew B.
Bardos, Paul
Church, Andrew
Puschenreiter, Markus
Friesl-Hanl, Wolfgang
Muller, Ingo
Neu, Silke
Mench, Michel
Witters, Nele
Vangronsveld, Jaco
Issue Date: 2013
Citation: Journal of environmental management, 129, p. 283-291
Abstract: Gentle Remediation Options (GRO) are risk management strategies or techniques for contaminated sites that result in no gross reduction in soil functionality (or a net gain) as well as risk management. Intelligently applied GROs can provide: (a) rapid risk management via pathway control, through containment and stabilisation, coupled with a longer term removal or immobilisation/isolation of the contaminant source term; and (b) a range of additional economic (e.g. biomass generation), social (e.g. leisure and recreation) and environmental (e.g. CO2 sequestration) benefits. In order for these benefits to be optimised or indeed realised, effective stakeholder engagement is required. This paper reviews current sector practice in stakeholder engagement and its importance when implementing GRO and other remediation options. From this, knowledge gaps are identified, and strategies to promote more effective stakeholder engagement during GRO application are outlined. Further work is required on integrating stakeholder engagement strategies into decision support systems and tools for GRO (to raise the profile of the benefits of effective stakeholder engagement and participation, particularly with sector professionals), and developing criteria for the identification of different stakeholder profiles/categories. Demonstrator sites can make a significant contribution to stakeholder engagement via providing evidence on the effectiveness of GRO under varying site contexts and conditions. Effective and sustained engagement strategies however will be required to ensure that site risk is effectively managed over the longer-term, and that full potential benefits of GRO (e.g. CO2 sequestration, economic returns from biomass generation and “leverage” of marginal land, amenity and educational value, ecosystem services) are realised and communicated to stakeholders.
Notes: Cundy, AB (reprint author), Univ Brighton, Sch Environm & Technol, Brighton, E Sussex, England. A.Cundy@brighton.ac.uk
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/15827
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.07.032
ISI #: 000327904400033
ISSN: 0301-4797
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validation: ecoom, 2015
Appears in Collections: Research publications

Files in This Item:

Description SizeFormat
Published version644.53 kBAdobe PDF

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.