Document Server@UHasselt >
Research >
Research publications >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/12137

Title: Comparative assessment of trial-level surrogacy measures for candidate time-to-event surrogate endpoints in clinical trials
Authors: Shi, Qian
Renfro, Lindsay A.
Bot, Brian M.
Sargent, Daniel J.
Issue Date: 2011
Citation: COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 55 (9). p. 2748-2757
Abstract: Various meta-analytical approaches have been applied to evaluate putative surrogate endpoints (S) of primary clinical endpoints (T), however a systematic assessment of their performance is lacking. Existing methods in the meta-analytic framework can be grouped into two types conventional and model-based trial-level surrogacy (TLS) measures. Both conventional and model-based TLS measures assess the ability to predict the treatment effect on T based on an observed treatment effect on putative S. Conventional TLS measures include correlation coefficients and R-square measures from weighted linear regression. Model-based TLS includes Copula R(2) proposed by Burzykowski et al. (2001). We examined and compared the estimation performance of these frequently used surrogacy measures in a large-scale simulation study. The impact of several key factors on the estimation performance was assessed, including the strength of the true surrogacy, the amount of effective information provided by available data, and the range of within-trial treatment effect on S and T. The TLS can be estimated accurately and precisely by both types of surrogacy measures when the true surrogacy is strong, number of trials is large, and the range of within-trial treatment effects is wide. When one or more factors deviate from the "best" scenarios, both types of TLS measures tend to underestimate the true surrogacy with increased variability. The estimation performance of conventional measures is similar to model-based measures, but with higher computational efficiency. The findings are applied to a large individual patient data pooled analysis in colon cancer. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Notes: [Shi, Q; Bot, BM; Sargent, DJ] Mayo Clin, Dept Hlth Sci Res, Rochester, MN 55905 USA [Renfro, LA] Baylor Univ, Dept Stat Sci, Waco, TX 76798 USA [Burzykowski, T; Buyse, M] Hasselt Univ, I BioStat, Diepenbeek, Belgium [Burzykowski, T; Buyse, M] Int Inst Drug Dev, Louvain, Belgium shi.qian2@mayo.edu
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/12137
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2011.03.014
ISI #: 000291916100017
ISSN: 0167-9473
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validation: ecoom, 2012
Appears in Collections: Research publications

Files in This Item:

Description SizeFormat
article181.21 kBAdobe PDF

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.