Document Server@UHasselt >
Research publications >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||Factors Predicting the Quality of Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer|
|Authors: ||Leonard, Daniel|
Van Eycken, Elizabeth
|Issue Date: ||2010|
|Publisher: ||LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS|
|Citation: ||ANNALS OF SURGERY, 252 (6). p. 982-988|
|Abstract: ||Objective: To determine preoperative tumor-, patient-, and treatment-related factors that are independently associated with incomplete mesorectal excision. Summary of Background Data: Incomplete total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer is associated with increased local and overall recurrences. Factors predicting incomplete mesorectal excision have scarcely been studied. Methods: In the context of PROCARE, a Belgian multidisciplinary project on rectal cancer, the quality of 266 consecutive and anonymized TME specimens submitted by 33 candidate-TME-trainers was graded by a blinded pathology review board in a standardized manner. Uni- and multivariable analysis were performed to identify factors that can independently predict incomplete mesorectal excision. Results: Mesorectal resection was complete in 21%, nearly complete in 47%, and incomplete in 32%. Of 57% of TME specimens the grade of resection had not been reported by the local pathologist. Incomplete TME doubled the incidence of a positive circumferential resection margin (P = 0.004). Factors found to be significantly related to incomplete TME in univariate analysis were as follows: surgeon, female gender, pathologic body mass index, low rectal cancer, negative clinical nodal status, the absence of downstaging after long-course chemoradiation, laparoscopic and converted laparoscopic resection, and abdominoperineal resection. Multivariable analysis identified pathologic body mass index (P = 0.017), the absence of downstaging after long-course chemoradiation (P = 0.0005), and laparoscopic or converted laparoscopic resection (P = 0.014) as factors that are independently associated with incomplete mesorectal excision. Conclusion: Good TME quality cannot be guaranteed. This peer-reviewed TME assessment revealed a number of factors that are independently related to incomplete TME. Both specimen and pathology report need to be audited.|
|Notes: ||[Penninckx, Freddy] Univ Clin Gasthuisberg, Dept Abdominal Surg, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium. [Leonard, Daniel] St Luc Univ Hosp, Dept Surg & Abdominal Transplantat, Colorectal Surg Unit, Brussels, Belgium. [Fieuws, Steffen] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Biostat 1, Louvain, Belgium. [Fieuws, Steffen] Univ Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium. [Jouret-Mourin, Anne; Sempoux, Christine] St Luc Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Brussels, Belgium. [Jehaes, Constant] Clin St Joseph CHC, Dept Abdominal Surg, Liege, Belgium. [Van Eycken, Elizabeth] Belgian Canc Registry, Brussels, Belgium.
|ISI #: ||000284603800013|
|Type: ||Journal Contribution|
|Validation: ||ecoom, 2011|
|Appears in Collections: ||Research publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.